JimF-LowBari Posted November 24, 2023 Share Posted November 24, 2023 (edited) 2 minutes ago, scheherazadesghost said: LOLwut. Is the tea too hot? The letter is available, dated Nov 16, at the online charity registration website. The same place this info has always been pulled from. For the umpteenth time, search for Vanguard/VMAPA under organization name and see document listed as "RCT-451A-S Delinquency Notice - 2nd." Plain as day. Some of us have justifiable reasons to believe the final word of the governing body over the organization. How long has SCV been working to “get that matter resolved “? Also that “not so little” issue that the governing body has the final say and not the organization (SCV). 🤦♂️ Edited November 24, 2023 by JimF-LowBari 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian Tuma Posted November 24, 2023 Share Posted November 24, 2023 2 hours ago, HockeyDad said: Hey SCV, are you gonna do this Again to your MMs? How about you stop shuffling around your cronies and start finding some people with competence? Start with a California- registered CPA. Make it a Forensic CPA 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IllianaLancerContra Posted November 24, 2023 Share Posted November 24, 2023 Just now, Brian Tuma said: Make it a Forensic CPA I marched with a guy who is now one. But he deals with international cases. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scheherazadesghost Posted November 24, 2023 Share Posted November 24, 2023 (edited) 19 minutes ago, JimF-LowBari said: How many times has SCV submitted paperwork that has been sent back for various reasons? That info's available on the charity registry website. It's at least a couple. 19 minutes ago, JimF-LowBari said: How many different BoD members have there been since paperwork was submitted correctly? That info's also available in their tax filings, but I'm not able to dig through that right now. There's been turnover in many seats, but at least one has been there long past best-practices term limits. 19 minutes ago, JimF-LowBari said: And how long have they been trying to get their audits together? Relatively unknown. I used to think they only hopped-to 'cause we went public, but I now believe they've been aware of this problem for at least a year. Still curious how they square that with soliciting and disbursing donations, something that a delinquent NPO in Cali should never have done. 19 minutes ago, JimF-LowBari said: Or perhaps the question is how many long term BoD members are there and do they get involved in this process? IOW possibly clueless but refuse to step away (have seen it elsewhere) I'll refrain from personal opinion here, as I explained one of my concerns already above. 14 minutes ago, Brian Tuma said: Make it a Forensic CPA You mean like the current CFO? 🙃 Edited November 24, 2023 by scheherazadesghost 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimF-LowBari Posted November 24, 2023 Share Posted November 24, 2023 4 minutes ago, scheherazadesghost said: That info's available on the charity registry website. It's at least a couple. That info's also available in their tax filings, but I'm not able to dig through that right now. There's been turnover in many seats, but at least one has been there long past best-practices term limits. Relatively unknown. I used to think they only hopped-to 'cause we went public, but I now believe they've been aware of this problem for at least a year. Still curious how they square that with soliciting and disbursing donations, something that a delinquent NPO in Cali should never have done. I'll refrain from personal opinion here, as I explained one of my concerns already above. You mean like the current CFO? 🙃 Thanks but I was just thinking out loud and didn’t expect an answer. After seeing the Reddit comment got thinking how long and involved this has been. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scheherazadesghost Posted November 24, 2023 Share Posted November 24, 2023 4 minutes ago, JimF-LowBari said: Thanks but I was just thinking out loud and didn’t expect an answer. After seeing the Reddit comment got thinking how long and involved this has been. Words cannot accurately express how wrong I want to be about all of this. That way I could go to the CO show in 2024 and enjoy the show fully knowing the members are protected and safe from as many possible adverse outcomes as possible. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IllianaLancerContra Posted November 24, 2023 Share Posted November 24, 2023 8 minutes ago, scheherazadesghost said: ….I used to think they only hopped-to 'cause we went public… I know you are originally from Texas, and as they say in Texas, ‘You can hope in one hand & spit into the other & see which fills up first’ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Terri Schehr Posted November 24, 2023 Share Posted November 24, 2023 52 minutes ago, scheherazadesghost said: LOLwut. Is the tea too hot? The letter is available, dated Nov 16, at the online charity registration website. The same place this info has always been pulled from. For the umpteenth time, search for Vanguard/VMAPA under organization name and see document listed as "RCT-451A-S Delinquency Notice - 2nd." Plain as day. Some of us have justifiable reasons to believe the final word of the governing body over the organization. Dubious? The guy who uncovered G7 before anyone? Hmmm okay. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Terri Schehr Posted November 24, 2023 Share Posted November 24, 2023 30 minutes ago, IllianaLancerContra said: I know you are originally from Texas, and as they say in Texas, ‘You can hope in one hand & spit into the other & see which fills up first’ Spit? 😂 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Lesher Posted November 24, 2023 Share Posted November 24, 2023 54 minutes ago, Brian Tuma said: Make it a Forensic CPA That ironically is the current CFO of SCV itself. The Board President is a CPA herself. SCV is well staffed with capability, just not competence. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts