HockeyDad

My favorite is: they want to destroy the corps / they want the corps to fold. One need look no further than the screed of a statement from CAE as they exited the stage. A case study in victim blaming.

No, you don’t get it. That would be the definition of a NON sexual relationship.

“I had a sexual relationship with a person who was 20 when I was 15” were your words. But maybe there is nuance there that I just wouldn’t understand.

I didn’t understand there was nuance when talking about an adult having sex with a minor. 🤷‍♂️

Well, not all of us figured it out by age 30 apparently. Based on the post we are discussing

Wait. I thought she was biased against the Scouts. Haha everyone has a beef with her.

I don’t know about triggered. To me, more like…disgusted. Disturbed. Over the passage of decades since this happened (minor and not minor “relations” which you thought was cool at the time - correct me if I’m wrong, you deleted the post so I am going by memory) your thoughts about the appropriateness of this hasn’t changed? That’s what I find disturbing. Again though I could be misremembering your post so if I am…sorry.

I know my kids’ hockey trophies are doing a good job holding up the power cord to my treadmill in the basement just in case we get water down there. Otherwise their value may be $0.50 give or take.

DCI has a museum? Huh.

Hang tight, Jeff. Keith Hall did a poor job on the quote. Those were not his words. They were posted by someone responding to Terri. Keith quoted Terri but accidentally included the words below hers. I knew something was off because Keith appeared to be contradicting himself….until I went back several pages, found the post he quoted, and realized those were not his words. 😵‍💫

Haha. Or maybe only the first letter.

Are you talking about member/member when one is 18+ and the other is younger than 18? Are you talking about dating ? What is your question? Just a generic how do you stop a member from molesting another member? Anyway, I would hope there is frequent repetition to the message of a zero tolerance policy and that if you see something, say something. Versus a one-time view the anti-harassment video, roll your eyes and move on. You want to date, and one of you is a marching member and the other is a staff member? Not gonna happen, sorry. Not under our auspices. You have options. You don’t have to be in our drum corps. Life is full of choices.

Interesting. I did not consider the possibility that the lawsuit is being used by the board as cover / excuse for the Chapter 7 bankruptcy. Versus the board causing the failure.

That’s kind of a leap of logic, dating to sexual assault. Anyway, who cares what the law says if the corps instituted a strict no dating policy. No stating that I agree with it, just going with the straw man.

Fantastic!