Jump to content

DCI Judging - YT Video by Funliner Productions


Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, ContraFart said:

DCI owes the fans an explanation beyond the scores. I am sure BD fans would like clarity on what happened in 2008 and non BD fans would like clarity on what happened in 2015 and 2019.

As a BD fan regarding 2008, drums didn't step up to up plate, they picked the wrong night to lay an egg by BD standards. Phantom won fair and square no excuses. 

2015, it's my understanding Crown had a bad run finals night, coupled with BD laying down one of their best runs of the season. 

Whether for or against BD, I personally have no issues with the final results. 

  • Like 6
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Chief Guns said:

As a BD fan regarding 2008, drums didn't step up to up plate, they picked the wrong night to lay an egg by BD standards. Phantom won fair and square no excuses. 

2015, it's my understanding Crown had a bad run finals night, coupled with BD laying down one of their best runs of the season. 

Whether for or against BD, I personally have no issues with the final results. 

Whether BD wins or loses, I have full trust in the judges. They were trained to do what they do, none of us have that training 

Edited by Cappybara
  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ContraFart said:

I get what you are saying, and I really wasn't trying to throw snark to @TheOneWhoKnows. However here is how I am understanding things:

If the achievement score is relative to your content score, then at some point content will max out (unless you are adding and layering) and you can perform the content to its maximum effectiveness. i.e. You can have a super easy show with a 5.0 content and a 10.0 achievement.

If the achievement score is relative to the rank and rate system of other corps, then content and achievement are used as separate measuring sticks and the achievement score would say that a higher score is cleaner. I can see how it sounds sort of the same, but if the achievement score were only tied to the content score, then a 10.0 in achievement would not mean as much when you have a 5.0 content score. It would mean that they are maxing out their level of content, not that they were better than a corps that scored a 9.9 with a 9.9 content score. Typing this out, I can now see where the "both" argument comes from, it just seems a bit fuzzy to me.

Where I differ is with the availability of judging materials. The last time judging sheets were made public by DCI was 2012 and those sheets only had bullet points, not so much a true description of the difference between performance boxes. I honestly believe that judges tapes are the silver bullet here, with our without permission. 

It can get very confusing. One one hand, we are absolutely providing two separate scores. A content and an achievement. But at the same time we cannot award achievement without recognizing the content. So you can absolutely over achieve your content, but there comes a point where your content holds back your achievement because your performers are capable of more. I believe the highest I have ever seen an achievement score go was .3 above content. Which if you understand the meaning of the tenth and the breakdown of tenths, that’s basically the maximum you can go above content in regards to achievement. 
 

A .3 tenth above content suggests you are seriously holding your performers back. And they should be challenged. 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Grandpa Joe said:

None of us have what? NONE OF US HAVE WHAT?! You can't just leave us hanging!!!

Oops fixed it 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Cappybara said:

Some of y’all clowns need to study this video closely, just saying 😂

Hey, I resemble that remark!  🤣

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, ContraFart said:

I get what you are saying, and I really wasn't trying to throw snark to @TheOneWhoKnows. However here is how I am understanding things:

If the achievement score is relative to your content score, then at some point content will max out (unless you are adding and layering) and you can perform the content to its maximum effectiveness. i.e. You can have a super easy show with a 5.0 content and a 10.0 achievement.

If the achievement score is relative to the rank and rate system of other corps, then content and achievement are used as separate measuring sticks and the achievement score would say that a higher score is cleaner. I can see how it sounds sort of the same, but if the achievement score were only tied to the content score, then a 10.0 in achievement would not mean as much when you have a 5.0 content score.

No group is scoring a 10 in achievement if their content is a 5. The sheets are not built that way. There has to be a balance between the two. If the show is a 5, then there is not much to actually achieve. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Chief Guns said:

 

2015, it's my understanding Crown had a bad run finals night, coupled with BD laying down one of their best runs of the season. 

 

I loved that Crown show and wanted it to win very badly.  The SF performance was sublime.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, jsd said:

No group is scoring a 10 in achievement if their content is a 5. The sheets are not built that way. There has to be a balance between the two. If the show is a 5, then there is not much to actually achieve. 

That doesn't make sense to me. You can go out and play a few major chords with perfect balance and sonority and get the maximum achievement from minimum content.

I thought the entire reason they went to a content/achievement system was to discourage designing content under the level of the corps so you can't go out with a simple show and win. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great video and information.

My only thought and not sure it will ever change is I wish they would take the most subjective category GE and reduce it to 30 and then give Music and Visual 35 each or something of that sort.  I know it's all subjective but GE is by and far the one where we see the biggest swings and crazy shifts so why do we keep giving it the most weight?  But at this point, I just enjoy the activity and the scores are what they are and no system will ever be perfect so no sense fretting too much on it from me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...