monoemono Posted June 26, 2006 Share Posted June 26, 2006 :feednotroll: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GMichael1230 Posted June 26, 2006 Share Posted June 26, 2006 Not at all.Bye Wow, the borg must be proud ! ~G~ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stream of Consciousness Posted June 26, 2006 Author Share Posted June 26, 2006 No. Of course not.Its just not good business or political sense to recognize or respond to a group that is campaigning against something you implemented if you're trying to be a bit discret about it.. Giving a formal response brings more attention to the issue. DCI just wanted to bring it in sort of under the radar. Thats my point then. Then what was the purpose if no response was expected & knowing full well, the petition would mean nothing? When you & others say "my voice was heard". Well then, WHo heard it? Other petitioners? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimF-LowBari Posted June 26, 2006 Share Posted June 26, 2006 Never said it was bad. But who actally heard them? Was there ever a formal reply from DCI, a Corps director, somebody with some influence? etc? Alright I'll erase my previous comments as you do have a valid question. If I remember right the petition was presented to DCI at a meeting by two people. Want to think byline or another female DCP member and ???? (totally forget who). The people presenting the petetion were treated in a curtious manner and that was about all the happened. If nothing else DCI was made aware that a bunch of people were not happy with the amps ruling. Perhaps more people than DCI was aware of. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JMS0527 Posted June 26, 2006 Share Posted June 26, 2006 Alright I'll erase my previous comments as you do have a valid question. If I remember right the petition was presented to DCI at a meeting by two people. Want to think byline or another female DCP member and ???? (totally forget who). The people presenting the petetion were treated in a curtious manner and that was about all the happened. If nothing else DCI was made aware that a bunch of people were not happy with the amps ruling. Perhaps more people than DCI was aware of. The other was Stephanie, LancerLady Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stream of Consciousness Posted June 26, 2006 Author Share Posted June 26, 2006 (edited) :feednotroll: How, I posed a question & have actually had a nice conversation with geluf & Jim F who have posted some valid responses. Unlike yours & GMichaels which have added nothing. Edited June 26, 2006 by Stream of Consciousness Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
geluf Posted June 26, 2006 Share Posted June 26, 2006 (edited) Thats my point then. Then what was the purpose if no response was expected & knowing full well, the petition would mean nothing? When you & others say "my voice was heard". Well then, WHo heard it? Other petitioners? People at shows who didn't know about amps being added, for one. The whole point was to let people know that this was happening and make a fuss over it. DCI didn't want to draw much attention to the issue because they figured it would be detrimental to the cause. Thus...if you're on the other team, you should want to draw as much attention as humanly possible to the issue. Edited June 26, 2006 by geluf Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FrankA Posted June 26, 2006 Share Posted June 26, 2006 Can someone provide a link to it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stream of Consciousness Posted June 26, 2006 Author Share Posted June 26, 2006 Alright I'll erase my previous comments as you do have a valid question. If I remember right the petition was presented to DCI at a meeting by two people. Want to think byline or another female DCP member and ???? (totally forget who). The people presenting the petetion were treated in a curtious manner and that was about all the happened. If nothing else DCI was made aware that a bunch of people were not happy with the amps ruling. Perhaps more people than DCI was aware of. Thanks for the info. B) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Galen Posted June 26, 2006 Share Posted June 26, 2006 That anti amp petition really was time well spent.Really paid off, huh :P It worked fine the first year we did it, so yes- it was time well spent. Thanks for making a positive contribution to DCP. And for those who are interested, sorry, but I will not post a link to the petition. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.