bawker Posted April 27, 2011 Author Share Posted April 27, 2011 And let's not split hairs on dominate vs. kill. Yes, actually let's do that very thing. "Domination" could refer to on the field, politically at the Rules Congress, or something else. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glory Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 One more. DCA is all-age, not every age. Cadets choice to select a limited spectrum of all age makes sense for the organiation without compromising anything in DCA. If some of you think different rules should apply, then complain about DCA, not YEA. HH 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glory Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 Yes, actually let's do that very thing. "Domination" could refer to on the field, politically at the Rules Congress, or something else. If you think that's what George is up to ... HH 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bawker Posted April 27, 2011 Author Share Posted April 27, 2011 One more. DCA is all-age, not every age. Cadets choice to select a limited spectrum of all age makes sense for the organiation without compromising anything in DCA. If some of you think different rules should apply, then complain about DCA, not YEA. HH Will it make as much sense if there's a shortfall in membership numbers (read: money for YEA)? I have a feeling the age limit will magically disappear if there's only 25 horns that show up in March. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bawker Posted April 27, 2011 Author Share Posted April 27, 2011 If you think that's what George is up to ... HH You seem to be the one who knows, no? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GUARDLING Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 I would guess if it were ALL ages that would hurt more than a few corps. But then one has to ask themselves by starting this corps is it their problem if others are hurt by it or should others reinvent themselves to serve its members better or at least different. hmmmm just food for thought 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dbc03 Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 Also they tried a feeder corps before, the Crossmen... didn't work out too well, heh? The Crossmen were never a feeder corps for The Cadets. Very few people moved from Crossmen to Cadets. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRASSO Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 (edited) Well, will gladly say when I made a mistake. *statement retracted* Your retraction accepted. Edited April 27, 2011 by BRASSO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charlie1223 Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 I'm wondering how things would have been different if the Cadets 2 was an open class corps instead of DCA. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MelloHorn13 Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 Viable? It's been viable for awhile actually. Corps are routinely being added throughout the country. Where I actually welcome the Cadets2 in DCA, the not being all-age really is a huge turn off. Kinda agree, they might be better off fielding a Open Class DCI corps... but I guess this will work too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.