garfield Posted December 13, 2018 Share Posted December 13, 2018 9 minutes ago, bullethead said: So let's just allow DCI to maintain the status quo due to a questionable wording in a news article....is that what you are hoping for? Good God, WTH did you come up with THAT? smh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toby Posted December 13, 2018 Share Posted December 13, 2018 2 hours ago, garfield said: Keep waiting, Mr. Snarky. It doesn't say "...put on probation...", either. Nice try, but that's a fail. The article says corps are not DISCIPLINED for matters relating to participant safety. That's false. It was true as of this year. Before then, only real suspensions were for finances (Troopers). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimF-LowBari Posted December 13, 2018 Share Posted December 13, 2018 6 minutes ago, garfield said: OH!! NOOO!! lol It’s about demanding accuracy and fairness in reporting. Words have meaning. Has any corps ever been ejected (or any of the words you used - still waiting, right?) because of not protecting participants from sexual harassment? No, not to my knowledge. Has any corps been disciplined because of participant safety issues? You betcha, and I gave examples. I don’t understand this motivation to let details pass. Example: there was this corps did something and something happened to them as punishment. Fine if no names given here but you should inform the reporter if she is mistaken. Or is the idea to let us know you have contacts and know things no one else does. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Terri Schehr Posted December 13, 2018 Author Share Posted December 13, 2018 Any chance we can get back on point here? I think the most troubling aspect of this article is how easily these people could move from corps-to-corps unfettered. 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seen-it-all Posted December 13, 2018 Share Posted December 13, 2018 Just now, JimF-LowBari said: Or is the idea to let us know you have contacts and know things no one else does. Don't be silly, that's Jeff Ream's job. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeff Ream Posted December 13, 2018 Share Posted December 13, 2018 12 minutes ago, garfield said: OH!! NOOO!! lol It’s about demanding accuracy and fairness in reporting. Words have meaning. Has any corps ever been ejected (or any of the words you used - still waiting, right?) because of not protecting participants from sexual harassment? No, not to my knowledge. Has any corps been disciplined because of participant safety issues? You betcha, and I gave examples. I don’t understand this motivation to let details pass. How about demanding transparency and owning up to past willing blindness? Or is that too much for you to agree to? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeff Ream Posted December 13, 2018 Share Posted December 13, 2018 9 minutes ago, garfield said: Word Smithing? Ha! I’m perfectly happy to win on accuracy. Accuracy matters, except at some national banks, of course. 😏 Yes be happy you continue to word smith for an organization ####### itself daily Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimF-LowBari Posted December 13, 2018 Share Posted December 13, 2018 1 minute ago, seen-it-all said: Don't be silly, that's Jeff Ream's job. Shhh I see Jeff face to face somtimes... ok face (me) to chest (jeff) sometimes... Irony is usually in church Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
garfield Posted December 13, 2018 Share Posted December 13, 2018 2 minutes ago, Terri Schehr said: Any chance we can get back on point here? I think the most troubling aspect of this article is how easily these people could move from corps-to-corps unfettered. Thank you, Terri. I won't use your request to comment further. I agree with you. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
N.E. Brigand Posted December 13, 2018 Share Posted December 13, 2018 Just now, JimF-LowBari said: Shhh I see Jeff face to face somtimes... ok face (me) to chest (jeff) sometimes... Jeff was taller than I expected him to be, when I finally met him a few months ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts