VOReason Posted November 13, 2009 Share Posted November 13, 2009 Next step is the Cadets will BECOME the logo....ala, Prince. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ssnapier Posted November 13, 2009 Share Posted November 13, 2009 I honestly don't care about the logo, and I just see it as a way to sell more souvie stuff because it is "new" so I am just sitting here waiting for the days to click by so I can see if they put out a good show or not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silver_King Posted November 13, 2009 Share Posted November 13, 2009 You mean like every other corps that's older than 50 years? Face it, every corps changes their name a little bit. Deal with it.Examples: Spirt of Atlanta / Spirit of Georgia / Spirit from JSU / Spirit / Spirit of Atlanta. Most Precious Blood Crusaders / Hyde Park Crusaders / Boston Crusaders Madison Explorer Scouts / Madison Scouts Chicago Cavaliers / AL Kosciuszko Post #712 / The Cavaliers First Federal Blue Stars / Blue Stars The Cadets / Cadets of Bergen County / Garfield Cadets / Holy Name Cadets A rose by any other name would smell as sweet. coming up Glassmen in 2011 Maumee Suns/ Glass City Optimists/Glassmen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommyfromhowardst Posted November 13, 2009 Share Posted November 13, 2009 (edited) I like this one. Edited November 14, 2009 by tommyfromhowardst Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Granny Smith Posted November 13, 2009 Share Posted November 13, 2009 (edited) One problem I have is that smaller organizations/businesses seemed to get bored quickly with their logos (and by quickly, that may mean every five years or even longer). Not sure that makes sense if you really are trying to develop a "brand". Nothing wrong with freshening up a logo. As I have looked at it several times now while in different moods, I think the C is too "weak". There doesn't seem to be any balance between the sideways chevrons and the C. Furthermore, I would think that this logo wouldn't produce well at smaller sizes...especially if it is reversed out. Oh...one last thing. This conjures up a railroad logo in my mind for some reason. Here is the same logo with a stronger C; however, that doesn't necessarily endear me to it. Edited November 13, 2009 by Granny Smith Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcsnare93 Posted November 13, 2009 Share Posted November 13, 2009 (edited) I personally prefer the running man, but not bad. I think the "C" could be more playful. For some reasons, this logo has a very strong coporate look... immediately reminds me that this could be a logo of Delta-Northwest Airlines merger. Honestly, that's the first thing that came to mind when I saw this design -- an airline logo. However, it is a simple, recognizable design. Edited November 13, 2009 by dcsnare93 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
84BDsop Posted November 13, 2009 Share Posted November 13, 2009 I like this one. That should be a bumper sticker....truly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grumpy Posted November 14, 2009 Share Posted November 14, 2009 It makes no difference what our feelings are on it, it has been announced that was the one that was chosen. If nothing else, Hop has shown in the past that once he makes a decision, he sticks with it no matter how much flak it generates. I think this is the logo that we will be seeing for the Cadets for the next several years, whether we like it or not. There's no judged category relating to corps logo.....let the corps performances do the talking. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boxingfred Posted November 14, 2009 Share Posted November 14, 2009 One problem I have is that smaller organizations/businesses seemed to get bored quickly with their logos (and by quickly, that may mean every five years or even longer). Not sure that makes sense if you really are trying to develop a "brand". Nothing wrong with freshening up a logo.As I have looked at it several times now while in different moods, I think the C is too "weak". There doesn't seem to be any balance between the sideways chevrons and the C. Furthermore, I would think that this logo wouldn't produce well at smaller sizes...especially if it is reversed out. Oh...one last thing. This conjures up a railroad logo in my mind for some reason. Here is the same logo with a stronger C; however, that doesn't necessarily endear me to it. I like the stronger C Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmancwbd Posted November 14, 2009 Share Posted November 14, 2009 i am not a fan! i think they should have stuck with the older one! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.