Jump to content

2017 Boston Crusaders


Recommended Posts

this yes but a winning staff is just 1 part of the puzzle. Many more factors and what others are doing and of course a little luck doesnt hurt..lol

I will ask...what are the other parts of the puzzle in your opinion of course?

Edited by Liahona
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will ask...what are the other parts of the puzzle in your opinion of course?

Big part is Admin. of a corps. You can have all the talent in the world and if the Admin. don't get it, I mean really get it. Good luck with that. Without naming names look back at some very good staff that have gone through the ranks of some lower corps and never had movement some never close to a finals or semi for that matter.

Members of course play a part, compatibility of staff, money, everyone on the same page rather than everyone wanting to be the cover story so to speak, vision, a very well planned out tour with ample time to complete the vision, ability to listen and put ego aside ( a hard one..lol ).ability to see the big picture,..there's just a few things imo

Edited by GUARDLING
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think when we come up with these what if's we tailor it to fit the argument.Do we really believe that corps X coming out in 10th going to jump to top 3? Putting aside the obvious IMO we are talking only a minimal amount of time to actually do this. Time is never on our side when catch up is the game played.

Given the level of competition today do you reallyy believe a 10th place corps coming out of the gate could go to 1st? lets look at this realistically. If a corps is so good as to jump that much in 8 weeks then why did they come out in 10th. Obviously there's a reason why a corps would come out 10th which would prevent such a jump.

Since you keep mentioning 10th, here is some context. Back in 1987, the Garfield Cadets lost to Spirit of Atlanta three times in June/July, yet it was Garfield that won DCI and Spirit that finished 10th. This was simply a case of one corps improving much more than another during the season, and judges calling it as it happened.

Now, if corps are so much better today, the margins between them should be narrower. Why would we expect less movement between corps? Should be more.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since you keep mentioning 10th, here is some context. Back in 1987, the Garfield Cadets lost to Spirit of Atlanta three times in June/July, yet it was Garfield that won DCI and Spirit that finished 10th. This was simply a case of one corps improving much more than another during the season, and judges calling it as it happened.

Now, if corps are so much better today, the margins between them should be narrower. Why would we expect less movement between corps? Should be more.

I would argue that 1987 was a completely different landscape than DCI today. The shows are infinitely more demanding, far more moving pieces, and to be honest the level of competitiveness in the 6-15 range is incomparable. Today, it is remarkable to accomplish what Academy did—which was to make finals after competing in the low teens for the early part of the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since you keep mentioning 10th, here is some context. Back in 1987, the Garfield Cadets lost to Spirit of Atlanta three times in June/July, yet it was Garfield that won DCI and Spirit that finished 10th. This was simply a case of one corps improving much more than another during the season, and judges calling it as it happened.

Now, if corps are so much better today, the margins between them should be narrower. Why would we expect less movement between corps? Should be more.

I use 10th only as a number say 12th pick anyone you want. Corps today for sure are more consistent than ever before. Higher levels from top to bottom. There's no denying that. If you need to go back 20 years to prove a point on anything, as many love to do( not saying you at all ) and sometimes even further than that the point is moot imo. 20 years plus ago is just that , a lifetime ago..

BUT you are also proving a point that I had mentioned about a corps knowing what to do, how to improve , did you come out and had no room for improvement, did all the ducks line up. What were the dynamics that put SOA in their position in the beginning then the end .

Its a good conversation and maybe needs it's own thread unless were still talking about BAC. Seems to have drifted a bit.

Edited by GUARDLING
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I use 10th only as a number say 12th pick anyone you want. Corps today for sure are more consistent than ever before. Higher levels from top to bottom. There's no denying that. If you need to go back 20 years to prove a point on anything as many love to do sometimes and sometimes even further than that the point is moot imo. 20 years plus go is just that , a lifetime ago..

BUT you ae also proving a point that I had mentioned about a corps knowing what to do, how to improve , did you come out and had no room for improvement, did all the ducks line up. What were the dynamics that put SOA in their position in the beginning then the end .

Its a good conversation and maybe needs it's own thread unless were still talking about BAC. Seems to have drifted a bit.

I think a lot of the conversation was concerning the importance of coming out of the gate strong...the fact that we had to dig 20 years to find an example to undo that...actually supports your assertion anyway IMO.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think a lot of the conversation was concerning the importance of coming out of the gate strong...the fact that we had to dig 20 years to find an example to undo that...actually supports your assertion anyway IMO.

Yes

Today's lower placing corps is not the lower placing corps of even 10 years ago let alone 20, 30 or 40 years back in time

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would argue that 1987 was a completely different landscape than DCI today. The shows are infinitely more demanding, far more moving pieces, and to be honest the level of competitiveness in the 6-15 range is incomparable. Today, it is remarkable to accomplish what Academy did—which was to make finals after competing in the low teens for the early part of the season.

There have been a few of this phenomena over the last several years that still amaze me...I'm probably forgetting some others I'm sure...

Boston Crusaders 1998 15th

Boston Crusaders 1999 9th

Carolina Crown 2002 16th

Carolina Crown 2003 10th

Troopers 2008 16th

Troopers 2009 12th

The Academy 2015 15th

The Academy 2016 11th

Edited by Liahona
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes

Today's lower placing corps is not the lower placing corps of even 10 years ago let alone 20, 30 or 40 years back in time

I would also guess that the sheer number of people on staff at any of the World Class corps dwarfs the staffs of 20 years ago.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...