Cappybara Posted May 20, 2016 Share Posted May 20, 2016 It's going to be a much different look! Hmm like Cavies 2015 different or Cavies 2013 different? 2013 was quite the departure from their usual minor modifications Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrumManTx Posted May 20, 2016 Share Posted May 20, 2016 Their uniform has never changed a whole ton, even in 2013, still distinctly Cavaliers and pretty similar I'm overall design. I'd honestly like something really clean and streamline, no extra fringe, hardware, ect. But that's just me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hook'emCavies Posted May 20, 2016 Share Posted May 20, 2016 I am just excited to see what they can bring to the field this year. Go Green Machine! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jjeffeory Posted May 20, 2016 Share Posted May 20, 2016 Well, it's about time for a makeover, I guess. I like the 80's - 2010ish design best, but I understand that it makes the look a little shorter. One thing to remember is that every corps above them last year has a newer and more radical design, so maybe they're thinking a fresh look will help them improve their fortunes and be more relevant in today's marching arts world. Phantom is the least changed, then SCV. The rest look pretty different than they have. Can't wait to see what they've come up with. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C.Holland Posted May 20, 2016 Share Posted May 20, 2016 Ive heard they're all getting codpieces this year. going full retro. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
littlejaw Posted May 20, 2016 Author Share Posted May 20, 2016 Ive heard they're all getting codpieces this year. going full retro. Back to Shakos and actually going with chartreuse this time? As long as when I see the uniform I immediately think of The Cavaliers I will be happy. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HockeyDad Posted May 20, 2016 Share Posted May 20, 2016 The term "propaganda" was first used in 1622 by Pope Gregory XV with the Sacra Congregatio de Propaganda Fide (sacred Congregation of Propagating Faith) to spread Catholicism to the heathens. Incidentally, the Cardinal Prefect of Propaganda is known as the "red pope". You fed the troll. Why? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRASSO Posted May 20, 2016 Share Posted May 20, 2016 (edited) The term "propaganda" was first used in 1622 by Pope Gregory XV with the Sacra Congregatio de Propaganda Fide (sacred Congregation of Propagating Faith) to spread Catholicism to the heathens. Incidentally, the Cardinal Prefect of Propaganda is known as the "red pope". While true regarding the word itself, " Propaganda " predates Roman Catholicism, and even predates the birth of Jesus Christ. Propaganda was initially considered an honorable activity in the transmittance of communication between ancient tribes. It was utilized in early Asian cultures. Later, the Ancient Greeks used it extensively too. Propaganda has been in existence according to most scholars since the beginning of Mankind. Only in recent times has " Propaganda " taken on a decidedly negative connotation. Source : https://www.historians.org/about-aha-and-membership/aha-history-and-archives/gi-roundtable-series/pamphlets/what-is-propaganda/the-story-of-propaganda Edited May 20, 2016 by BRASSO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cadevilina Crown Posted May 20, 2016 Share Posted May 20, 2016 While true regarding the word itself, " Propaganda " predates Roman Catholicism, and even predates the birth of Jesus Christ. Propaganda was initially considered an honorable activity in the transmittance of communication between ancient tribes. It was utilized in early Asian cultures. Later, the Ancient Greeks used it extensively too. Propaganda has been in existence according to most scholars since the beginning of Mankind. Only in recent times has " Propaganda " taken on a decidedly negative connotation. Source : https://www.historians.org/about-aha-and-membership/aha-history-and-archives/gi-roundtable-series/pamphlets/what-is-propaganda/the-story-of-propaganda [/needless bickering] 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRASSO Posted May 20, 2016 Share Posted May 20, 2016 (edited) [/needless bickering] There is no" bickering " on this thread. I see only civil discussion, respectful discourse, and respectful replies. Get a grip, CC ( haha! ) Edited May 20, 2016 by BRASSO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.